Blink helps to answer the most common questions around LEVI funding and how it differs from other/previous funding
Solutions for local government
Funding and Grant Support FAQ's for Local Authorities
FAQs: LEVI Funding and EV Grants for Local Authorities
What’s the difference between LEVI and ORCS funding?
ORCS (On-Street Residential Charging Scheme) focused on residential on-street solutions, while LEVI has a broader remit, including public, workplace, and destination charging. LEVI also supports larger infrastructure rollouts, capacity building, and partnerships with the private sector.
What can LEVI funding be used for?
Capital funding covers the installation of EV charging stations, grid upgrades, and associated infrastructure. Capability funding supports project planning, legal advice, stakeholder coordination, and technical procurement resources within Local Authorities.
How long does it take to receive LEVI funding once a bid is approved?
After formal contract approval, funding drawdown and mobilisation can begin shortly after. Timelines vary by project scope and procurement readiness but range from 2-6 months for early deployment.
Can we use LEVI funding with a concession-based delivery model?
Yes. Many Local Authorities opt for concession models where a supplier like Blink installs, operates, and maintains the infrastructure at no upfront cost to the council. LEVI can co-fund these models by de-risking early capital or accelerating deployment.
Is Blink registered on compliant procurement frameworks?
Yes. Blink is pre-approved on several public-sector frameworks, including CCS RM6270, ESPO, and YPO, enabling streamlined, compliant procurement for Local Authorities.
When will the next LEVI funding window open?
The final ITT for Phase 2 closed in November 2024. Phase 3 scoping is expected to begin in late 2025. Authorities should begin preparations now to be ready when applications reopen.
Is LEVI different from ORCS?
Yes. ORCS closed in 2023. LEVI is broader and better funded.
Can rural areas apply?
Yes. Rurality weighting favours applications from underserved regions.
Do we need match funding?
Typically 50%, often via revenue-share or concession structures.